Kohn v. Lucas
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, J.
That motions made in any case cannot be noticed by appellate courts, unless they are set out in the bill of exceptions, has been so frequently and uniformly decided in this state, that the point must be considered definitely settled. — State v. Wall, 15 Mo. 208; Loudon v. King, 22 Mo. 337; Corby v. Tracy, 62 Mo. 515; McCarthy v. McGinnis, 76 Mo. 345; State v. Gee, 79 Mo. 313. Nor is the appellant who thus fails to incorporate the motion in his bill Of exceptions, aided by the fact that the clerk incorporates the same in the transcript as part of the record proper; because it has been decided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. WallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
- Jefferson City v. OpelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
- Christy's Administrator v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
- State v. GeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- Corby v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Malin v. MerriamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Monroe City Bank v. FinksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Dix v. German InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- Mize v. BurnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- City of St. Louis v. PahlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.