Legal Opinion

Koonce v. Fort

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Tbe only question presented by this appeal for decision by this Court is whether there was error in tbe order of Judge Harris directing tbe commissioners to' return to F. R. Davis tbe sum of $1,850, deposited witb them by him as tbe last and highest bidder at tbe sale made by tbe commissioners on 14 November, 1932. This sum was deposited by F. R. Davis witb tbe commissioners pursuant to tbe order of Judge Moore. This was a valid order, made by Judge Moore in tbe exercise of bis judicial discretion. Alexander v. Boyd, ante, 103, 167 S. E., 462, is not applicable to this order. In that case, we…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alexander v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Pringle v. Winston-Salem Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Virginia Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richmond County v. . SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Koonce v. . FortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API