Legal Opinion

Oskins v. Miller

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1929No. 3267PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PARKER, J.

This case was before us upon a motion to quash the writ of error, which motion was denied. 263 P. 766. The case is now here upon the merits. The district court entered the following judgment:

“That the said motion to dismiss the said appeal be and. the same is hereby sustained, and the said appeal is hereby dismissed at the cost of the said appellant, Hobart Oskins, and the clerk of said court shall tax the fees of the witnesses of the said George Miller against the said appellant. To all of which the said defendant, Hobart Oskins, objects and excepts; and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Oskins v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reece v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stripling v. PMC Realtors, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Rixey v. BurginNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API