Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Horton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1974No. 28788, 28789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Presiding Justice.

The plaintiff in the trial court (appellee here) sued Aetna Casualty and Surety Company as a third party defendant to have an insurance policy reformed and to obtain a judgment based upon equitable estoppel.

The history surrounding this litigation is somewhat involved but a brief synopsis is as follows:

In 1959 R. L. Horton, Jr., began a business which he operated under the name of Horton Electric Company. When he began operation of such business he contacted a Mr. Dick Peters (now deceased) of a local insurance firm to obtain insurance. The policy was written by Mr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blount v. BeallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Hasty v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Horton v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  4. Smith v. AmmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Ammons v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Vann v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Weekes v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. WallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API