Goldstein v. Godfrey Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, 'borough of Manhattan, first district, in favor of defendant, dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGavegan, J.
The action was to recover the value of work, labor and services and materials furnished by the plaintiffs at the special instance and request of the defendant.
The undisputed facts are as follows: On September 4, 1907, plaintiffs received a post card requesting them to call, and. bearing the stamp of the defendant company with its address. Pursuant to this, request, one of the plaintiffs called at the address given and had a conversation with a Mr. Spiro, which resulted in a contract being made, by the terms of which plaintiffs were to do certain work at Ho. 669 Hinth avenue, Hew York city.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. Kings County Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Slingerland v. NortonNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Roos v. DeckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901