MacMillan v. Callahan
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McCLOUD, Chief Justice.
At issue is the ownership of an undivided 595/1500 royalty interest.
The questions to be discussed involve the inception of title doctrine and the effect of an unprobated will.
Plaintiffs, Daniel F. Callahan, Eugene H. Callahan, Laurance David Jones, and Esther Marilyn Robinson, sued defendants, Thomas Dunn MacMillan, L. S. Kent and his unknown heirs, and the unknown heirs of Esther Dunn Callahan, deceased, seeking judgment quieting title and a declaration that they owned a 595/1500 royalty interest in the following described land in Stephens County, Texas:
The West 60…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Welder v. LambertTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Creamer v. BriscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Skov v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Milner v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- MacRae v. MacRaeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.