Legal Opinion

Reams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1976No. M-76-231PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BLISS, Judge:

The Appellant, Charlie Wade Reams, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried before a jury and convicted of the crime of Resisting an Officer in the Legal Performance of His Duty. Punishment was assessed by the jury at “26 weekends in the county jail and $500 fine.” From a judgment and sentence in conformance with the verdict the defendant has perfected his timely appeal.

Briefly stated, the evidence adduced at trial is as follows, to-wit: Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff Roy Clugston testified that on the morning of October 8, 1975, he was on duty working in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Born v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Lauhoff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Cummins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Neill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
  3. Allen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Sandersfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Renfro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API