Legal Opinion

Root v. Merriam

United States Circuit Court

Decided June 26, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Suit on Promissory Notes.

1Opinion of the CourtDundy, J.

This suit is based upon two promissory notes, executed and delivered by the defendant to the parties, and for the purpose hereafter to be stated. Issues wore joined, the cause was tried before a jury, and by them a special verdict was rendered, on which both parties claim they are entitled to judgment. The one note was given by the defendant to Martin & Bennett, in the city of Chicago, on the twenty-fourth of February, 1888, for the sum of $346.25, due in one year from that date. The other note was given to Thomas Bennett, at the same time and place, for the sum of S500, due in one year from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. BackhausWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chapin v. DakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Traders Bank v. AlsopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  5. Harper v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Irwin v. MarquettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API