Ex Parte Richards
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was taken in charge by Cranford at Abbott on a telephone communication from Hillsboro, and, while so in charge of said Cranford, it is claimed, offered him $50 to permit hm to escape. The writ of habeas corpus was resorted to to obtain his discharge, on the ground that the affidavit of Cranford does not show a violation of the law. When the case came on for trial, Cranford testified that he had received a telephone message from the sheriff of Hill County to look for a man of a particular description, who was wanted upon a charge of misdemeanor, and,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Sugarman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
- Goldsberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- McCrady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Boyd v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.