Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Richards

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 4, 1903No. 2675PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was taken in charge by Cranford at Abbott on a telephone communication from Hillsboro, and, while so in charge of said Cranford, it is claimed, offered him $50 to permit hm to escape. The writ of habeas corpus was resorted to to obtain his discharge, on the ground that the affidavit of Cranford does not show a violation of the law. When the case came on for trial, Cranford testified that he had received a telephone message from the sheriff of Hill County to look for a man of a particular description, who was wanted upon a charge of misdemeanor, and,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sugarman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. Goldsberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Garner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. McCrady v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Boyd v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API