Legal Opinion

Scanlon v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 17, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarrows, J.

This is an action by one physician against another to recover for services rendered as first assistant at approximately fifty major operations.

The declaration alleges an express contract and also contains the common counts. On a plea of non assumpsit the case was tried without a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence defendant moved to strike out the common counts, cf. Rowe v. City Land Trust, 111 Atl. 747, because plaintiff’s testimony was that defendant had expressly agreed to pay him $50 per operation. The court declined, to grant the motion holding that there still might remain the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Smith v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  3. Dorion v. JacobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  4. Henry v. MondilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1928
  5. Board of Comm'rs of Marion Co. v. ChambersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citron v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Ravitz v. ChirelsteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API