Legal Opinion

Myers v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1963No. [App. No. 66, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In his petition for post conviction relief, the applicant’s contentions fell into the following categories: (1) applicant’s constitutional rights (due process) were denied; (2) the investigating officers were negligent (failed to produce documents and records) ; (3) evidence was suppressed; (4) illegal search and seizure; (5) applicant’s witnesses were not produced in court; (6) error in sentencing (sentenced to 20 years from April 19, 1962 when crime for which he was convicted allegedly took place on April 29, 1962); (7) incompetency of counsel because of his “failure to produce records, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hayden v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rush v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Hyde v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. Hunt v. Warden, Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  4. Galloway v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. John Wesley Hunt v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, John Nathan Bristow, Jr. v. Vernon L. Pepersack, Warden, Maryland State Penitentiary, James E. Cox v. Vernon L. Pepersack, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API