Scurlock v. City of Springdale
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
The question presented on this appeal is: Does the Arkansas Compensation Tax Act, Act 487 of 1949, which imposes a two (2%) per cent tax [commonly called “Use Tax”] on merchandise bought from without and used within the State of Arkansas, apply to such purchases made by a municipal corporation?
The City of Springdale, a city of the first class, during the years 1950, 1951 and 1952 purchased from without the State certain articles such as concrete pipe, fire hose and equipment, janitor supplies, etc., amounting to $35,246.57. The Revenue Department of the State of Arkansas required the City of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCain, Comm. of Labor v. Crossett Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Boone County v. KeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
- Moses v. McLeod, Comm. of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- U-Drive-'Em Service Co. v. Hardin, Comm. of Rev.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Mobley v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jefferson Cooperative Gin, Inc. v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Commissioner v. Ark. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Heath v. El Dorado Golf & Country ClubSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Georgia Pacific Corp. v. LarrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.