Legal Opinion

Akabas & Cohen v. Fox Rothschild LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

*461The claims are barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see generally Matter of Hunter, 4 NY3d 260, 269 [2005]). It is true that the prior action (Cohen v Akabas & Cohen, 71 AD3d 419 [2010]; 79 AD3d 460 [2010]) was between plaintiff and nonparty Richard Cohen, not between plaintiff and defendant. However, Cohen, who was a partner at defendant at all relevant times, was in privity with defendant (see Pitcock v Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, 27 Misc 3d 1238[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51093[U] [2010], affd 80 AD3d 453 [2011], lv denied 16 NY3d 711 [2011]). In the prior action, plaintiff could…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Shandell v. KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Pitcock v. Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Cohen v. Akabas & CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Cohen v. Akabas & CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API