Tyree v. Boston Scientific Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
(.Motion in Limine No. 9)
JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, District Judge.
Pending before the court is Boston Scientific Corporation’s (“BSC”) Motion in Limine to Preclude Any Evidence or Argument That Boston Scientific Owed 'or Breached a Duty to Warn Plaintiffs Directly (“Motion in Limine No. 9”). (See BSC’s Initial Mots, in Limine [Docket 374], at ¶ 9). For the reasons set forth below, BSC’s Motion in Limine No. 9 is GRANTED.
I. Background
This consolidated case resides in one of seven MDLs assigned to me by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation concerning the use of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Perez v. Wyeth Laboratories Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Zimmer, Nexgen Knee Implant Prods. Liab. Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Joas v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Leavitt v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.