Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hedges v. Conder

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1969No. 53200Published

1DissentMoore, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

I. The majority adopts defendant’s contention that under the provisions of Code section 321.328 and section 30-33.01 of the Des Moines Municipal Code a person in the street not in a crosswalk in a business district is negligent as a matter of law and the jury should be so instructed. I disagree with such a holding under the facts here.

I agree that violation of a law of the road, including valid city ordinances, without legal excuse, is negligence per se with the one exception, not applicable here, as established by our oft-cited case of Kisling v. Thierman, 214 Iowa…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Nugent v. QuamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Stewart v. HiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Dennis v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API