Hedges v. Conder
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMoore, Justice
I respectfully dissent.
I. The majority adopts defendant’s contention that under the provisions of Code section 321.328 and section 30-33.01 of the Des Moines Municipal Code a person in the street not in a crosswalk in a business district is negligent as a matter of law and the jury should be so instructed. I disagree with such a holding under the facts here.
I agree that violation of a law of the road, including valid city ordinances, without legal excuse, is negligence per se with the one exception, not applicable here, as established by our oft-cited case of Kisling v. Thierman, 214 Iowa…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Nugent v. QuamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Stewart v. HiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
- Dennis v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.