Commonwealth v. Lewis
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
There is no question whatsoever as to the sufficiency of the evidence to warrant convictions on both the remaining indictments. None of the other assignments of error is based on an exception (see Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 796 [1975]), and there is nothing in the record (or in the probation report marked for identification) to suggest that a “ ‘substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice’ (Commonwealth v. Freeman, 352 Mass. 556, 564 [1967]) will result from our following the usual rule of refusing to pass on exceptions not taken (Commonwealth v. Foley, 358 Mass. 233, 236…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. UnderwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. O'NeilMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FergusonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HannafordMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HollandMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980