Legal Opinion

Merick v. McNally

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Bay Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The suit below was brought on behalf of McNally, as original contractor, and Henratty, as his assignee of a half interest in the contract, against plaintiffs in error, to recover the price of lumber furnished. The defense rested on an alleged failure to comply with the contract. The agreement was made September 21, 1889, for the purchase of timber, to be delivered in the early part of the next year; and the terms which are material in this present record, are as follows:

“ Said Paul McNally agrees to get out and deliver to said Merick, Fowler and Esselstyn, at or near Wenona, sixty thousand…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Odum v. GarnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Walker v. SymsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Everitt, Seedsman v. Indiana Paper Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API