Stills v. State

McFADDEN, Judge.

Delletorious Stills appeals his convictions of conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery, attempted armed robbery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of *768a felony. Stills argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the convictions. In particular, he argues that the evidence was insufficient as to the convictions relating to victim Bernardo Franco because the indictment listed that victim’s name as Franco Bernardo, but a mere misnomer is not a fatal variance. He argues that his convictions are founded on uncorroborated…