Legal Opinion

Todd v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 18, 2016No. CR-15-959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM. Michael Kinard, Judge

11 Michael Todd appeals the revocation of his suspended imposition of sentence (SIS) in six cases. 1 He contends that the petition to revoke should have been dismissed and that there were errors in sentencing. We affirm.

In early 2009, appellant was charged in six different cases with a.total of nine counts of breaking or entering. Appellant was charged as a habitual offender and faced a maximum of fifteen years’ imprisonment on each charge. -He entered a negotiated plea to all of the charges in April 2009 and was sentenced on each count to concurrent terms of eight years’ imprisonment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chadwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Todd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Rameriz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Todd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael J. Todd v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2023
  2. Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API