England v. State

England prosecutes this appeal after he had been convicted by a jury for the offense of uttering a forged instrument.

The claimed errors are as follows:(1) That the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence.(2) The court erred in refusing to strike out the testimony of a witness; said testimony being in the nature of a conclusion and was beyond the knowledge of the witness.(3) The court erred in admitting into evidence two [2] handwritten checks found in the appellant’s car after his arrest.(4) That the trial court erred in giving to the jury defendant’s instruction number 14…