Legal Opinion

Mead v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 24, 1968No. 68-144PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANN, Judge.

The appellant, Mead, was tried without a jury and found guilty of unlawfully, feloniously and wantonly shooting a deadly missile into a used or occupied public building in violation of Fla.Stat. § 790.19, F.S.A.

He claims reversible error was committed because there was insufficient evidence submitted to support the guilty verdict. Although there is evidence to the contrary, Mead claims he was firing a shotgun in self-defense at the intended victim, who had just disarmed Mead of a pistol which he had been carrying, and that therefore he lacked the requisite intent under Golden v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Eizenman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  2. Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Delaughter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. C.H. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API