Legal Opinion
F. H. Von Damm, Inc. v. New York Telephone Co.
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided July 30, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtSimon J. Liebowitz, J.
The plaintiff, in its short-form complaint, alleges that the defendant, in violation of the tariff rates as filed with the Public Service Commission, overcharged the plaintiff, a New York corporation, with its place of business located in Brooklyn, the sum of $623 for listings during the years 1967 and 1968, in the classified directories for Queens and Manhattan. There is no claim of overcharges for the Brooklyn classified directory. The defendant agrees that the sum of $623 would be a correct mathematical calculation if the premise of the plaintiff’s contention were correct.
However, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Service Commission v. Taconic Telephone Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1981