Legal Opinion
De Stefano v. Kaufman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohn B. Tenney, J.
In this action to set aside an Onondaga County tax deed, defendant has moved for summary judgment. Plaintiff has cross-moved for the same relief. Peter Pasqua, now deceased, took title to the subject property in 1954. Upon his death in 1961, the plaintiff was appointed administratrix of his property. The taxes were unpaid, there was a tax sale, the county was the only bidder and purchased the property as of October 1, 1965.
The County Treasurer advertised that the period of redemption would expire on October 1, 1967. Plaintiff did not redeem the property at that time. There was no further…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cimo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Clason v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- County Securities, Inc. v. SeacordNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- City of New York v. MaltbieNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- McCoun v. . PierpontNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Burnell G. Carney and Alice Carney, by L. David Zube, Chapter 11 Trustee v. James v. PhilipponeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Culspar, Inc. v. County of EssexNew York Supreme Court · 1983
- Walsh v. Blair, New York County Courts1977
- R. M. Investors Corp. v. Maggi, New York County Courts1980
- Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.