Legal Opinion

State v. Adamson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1995No. 94-282PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

Evid.R. 601(B) governs the competency of spouses to testify against each other regarding criminal activity. The rule provides:

“Every person is competent to be a witness except:

(t * * *

“(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies:
“(1) A crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged;
“(2) The testifying spouse elects to testify.”

The focus of Evid.R. 601(B) is the competency of the testifying spouse; in contrast, R.C. 2945.42 focuses on the privileged nature of spousal communications:

“ * * * Husband…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. RahmanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. HennessOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  5. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API