Legal Opinion
State v. Adamson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1995No. 94-282PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
Evid.R. 601(B) governs the competency of spouses to testify against each other regarding criminal activity. The rule provides:
“Every person is competent to be a witness except:
(t * * *
“(B) A spouse testifying against the other spouse charged with a crime except when either of the following applies:
“(1) A crime against the testifying spouse or a child of either spouse is charged;
“(2) The testifying spouse elects to testify.”
The focus of Evid.R. 601(B) is the competency of the testifying spouse; in contrast, R.C. 2945.42 focuses on the privileged nature of spousal communications:
“ * * * Husband…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RahmanOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HennessOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Henness v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.