Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Holy See
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 19, 2012No. 11 C 7188PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge.
Charles Anderson, individually and on behalf of a putative class, brings this action against the Holy See, the Catholic Bishop of Chicago (“Bishop”), and all administrative units of the Roman Catholic Church (“Church”) in the United States (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging that he was sexually abused by priests and other employees of the Church in the 1950s and 1960s. (R. 1, Compl.)1 Presently before the Court is the Bishop’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (R. 18,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Brooks v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. Holy SeeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Ritchie Capital Management v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Doe v. Portsmouth Abbey SchoolDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2024
- Pagan v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020