Legal Opinion

Miller v. Spokane Bakery Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1912No. 10377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal — Review—Briefs. Claims of error not discussed in the briefs or mentioned in the oral argument will not be noticed on appeal. Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Black, J., entered October 14, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in1 an action for injuries sustained in a collision with an automobile.

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

Action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the respondent wife, as the result of being struck by an automobile truck driven by an employee of appellant. A verdict of $1,000 was returned, and this appeal is taken from the judgment, alleging error in denying motions for nonsuit, for directed verdict, and for judgment notwithstanding verdict.

These motions all raise the question of contributory negligence on the part of Mrs. Miller, and are predicated upon appellant’s contention as to the point in the street where the accident occurred, and as to whether Mrs. Miller was crossing the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harder v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Group14 Technologies Inc v. Nexeon LimitedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API