State v. Tatman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Adcm District Gowrt. This is a prosecution under an indictment for the crime of uttering a forged deed. There was a trial by jury and defendant was convicted, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
1. CRIMINAL law: twice m jeopardy: ad-court'pend-1 mg trial I. The defendant was put upon trial at the March term,-1880. After all the evidence had been introduced, the presiding judge received a telegram , ’ r „ ° from his home at Des Moines, to the effect that 7 w^e waS S^’ an<^ asPíng Finí to gO to his home. This was on the 9 th day of March, 1880. The court was adjourned until the following Friday, and the jury were discharged until that time, and the judge went to his home. On Friday, the judge by a telegram ordered the court to be finally adjourned, and on the Monday following his wife…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. RedmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
- State v. CallendineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by16 opinions
- Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Woodward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
- State v. LarkinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- People v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. CritelliSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.