Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Heaton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1901No. 3,496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Martin Circuit Court; M. 8. Hastings, Special ■Judge. Action by John W. Heaton, assignee of the JenkinsHeaton Lumber Company, against Benjamin C. Johnson, ■surviving partner of the firm of Johnson & Chenowith, for the enforcement of a contract. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Appellee, who was plaintiff below, recovered judgment in the lower court for $1,778.35. The cause was tried upon an amended complaint and upon proper request the court made a special finding of facts and stated conclusions of law thereon. The errors relied upon for a reversal of the judgment, as stated in appellant’s brief, are that the court erred in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, and “in its conclusions of law upon the special finding.”

The amended complaint avers that the Jenkins-Heaton Manufacturing Company, the assignor of the appellee, entered into a contract with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Branham v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Kerstetter v. RaymondIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Pickens v. BozellIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Garver v. DaubenspeckIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Boyle v. GuysingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deep Vein Coal Co. v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API