In re McKenzie
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION *
JAMES P. SMITH, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case presents the issue of whether a debtor must pay interest on unsecured *662claims in order to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(b)(1)(A) where the debtor is not paying all of his “projected disposable income” to unsecured creditors as required by section 1325(b)(1)(B).
According to the facts stipulated by Debtor and the Chapter 13 trustee in open court on August 28, 2014, Debtor is an above median income debtor for purposes of section 1325, with no dependents. Accordingly, Debtor’s “projected disposable income” is $1,113.21, as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamilton v. LanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In Re RheinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
- In Re RichallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Matter of EatonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015
- Charlton Scott MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2021
- Deontae M. MatthewsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020