Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orphan v. Pilnik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2009Published

1Dissent

Acosta and Renwick, JJ.,

dissent in part in a memorandum by Renwick, J., as follows: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging injury due to medical malpractice based on negligence and medical malpractice based on lack of informed consent after a breast biopsy to determine whether she had breast cancer left a scar on her right breast. Dr. Samuel Pilnik, a breast surgeon, performed the biopsy at Lenox Hill Hospital. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to all defendants and dismissed the entire action. The dismissal of the lack of informed consent claim against Pilnik and Lenox Hill is the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. CaldwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Zeleznik v. Jewish Chronic Disease HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. Dooley v. SkodnekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Walter v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Iazzetta v. VicenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API