Legal Opinion

Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Hadlock

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1950No. 12592Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

The very earnest motion for rehearing of the appellant presents nothing new except that for the first time the proviso in F.S.A. § 320.46 is urged as relieving the railroad company from responsibility for the absence from the crossing signs of reflectors for night warning in that the trial judge held the section to be inapplicable and “there was a likely valid ground for his ruling, namely, that counsel for the plaintiffs admitted in his conference with the court (R. 296) that the state road department had erected a sign at the crossing”, and that the court’s charge…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  2. Ouzts v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  3. Good v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API