Legal Opinion

In re Wowtschuk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with six *123allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained Charges One, Three, Four and Five. Charge Six was sustained to the extent of finding the respondent guilty of neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him. The petitioner concedes that the Special Referee was correct in not sustaining Charge Two. The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent has submitted an affirmation in reply, in which he concedes that the report of the Special Referee is correct as to its…

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re TeschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API