In re Wowtschuk
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
In this proceeding, the respondent was charged with six *123allegations of professional misconduct. The Special Referee sustained Charges One, Three, Four and Five. Charge Six was sustained to the extent of finding the respondent guilty of neglecting a legal matter entrusted to him. The petitioner concedes that the Special Referee was correct in not sustaining Charge Two. The petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Special Referee and the respondent has submitted an affirmation in reply, in which he concedes that the report of the Special Referee is correct as to its…
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re TeschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004