People v. Rhorer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Mullarkey
We granted certiorari in People v. Rhorer, 946 P.2d 503 (Colo.App.1997), to determine whether violation of a “no-eontact” court order (no-contact order) issued by the Denver County Court pursuant to a municipal ordinance can serve as a predicate act, i.e., constitutes a “crime,” for purposes of the second degree burglary statute, section 18-4-203, 6 C.R.S. (1998). 1 In contrast to the trial court, the court of appeals held that an intent to violate a no-contact order does not qualify as an “intent to commit therein a crime against a person or property.” § 18-4-203, 6 C.R.S. (1997). Because…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. ArchuletaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- City of Greeley v. HammanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Wilczynski v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- People v. RhorerColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooper v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- State v. StintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- State v. StintonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- People v. ThomeczekColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. WidhalmColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.