Swingless Golf Club Corp. v. Taylor
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIMS
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
The Court once again turns its attention to the “swingless” golf club: a pyrotechnic device that uses explosive charges, a wedge-shaped piston, and a trigger to blast golf balls hundreds of yards down a fairway. Designed for golfers who cannot (or would rather not) swing, this intriguing invention — which looks like a traditional golf club except that it is loaded with gunpowder — stands at the heart of this dispute.
The instant motion targets the four remaining counterclaims in this action. In short,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Surrell v. California Water Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Jones v. H. F. Ahmanson & Co.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Nilsson v. City of MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Oakdale Village Group v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- English & Sons, Inc. v. Straw Hat Restaurants, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Mercola.Com, LLC v. Google, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Ng Chie v. Citigroup, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021