Legal Opinion

Michael L. Larr v. Warden Misty Mackey

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 27, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01730Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Michael L. Larr, Petitioner, Case No. 2:24-cv-1730 Vv. Judge Michael H. Watson Warden Misty Mackey, Magistrate Judge Merz Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER Michael Larr (“Petitioner”), proceeding pro se in this habeas case, objects, ECF No. 42, to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendations (“R&R”) recommending dismissal of the Petition with prejudice, ECF No. 39. The objections were filed on December 19, 2025, and served on Warden Misty Mackey (‘Respondent’) the day before, but Respondent did not respond. They are thus…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API