Legal Opinion
State v. Zakaria
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 2007No. 24051PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Fadi Zakaria was convicted of first degree robbery and committing or attempting to commit a felony with a firearm. He appeals claiming: the introduction of a taped police interview of a co-defendant violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation; the trial court erred in admitting a gun found after the robbery; and questioning in taped police interviews impermissibly commented on his credibility. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶2.] On March 2, 2004, an employee and one customer were inside the Royal Flush Casino in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. At…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. CottierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Fool BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Axelburg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.