Legal Opinion
Ricci v. Superintendent, Bureau of Banking
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 18, 1984PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Joseph Ricci and Martha Amesbury appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County) dismissing for lack of standing their complaint seeking review of a final agency action by the Superintendent of the Bureau of Banking. Since we agree with the Superior Court’s finding that the plaintiffs have failed to allege any particularized injury that would allow them to challenge the Superintendent’s decision, we affirm the Superior Court judgment.
In August 1983, Key Banks, Inc. of Albany, New York applied to the Bureau of Banking to acquire Depositors Corporation, a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fletcher v. FeeneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Heald v. School Administrative District No. 74Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Northeast Occupational Exchange, Inc. v. Bureau of RehabilitationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Seaborne v. LookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tisei v. Town of OgunquitSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Finance Authority of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Lindemann v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election PracticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Hopkins v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Nergaard v. Town of Westport IslandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.