Young v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
The complaint alleges that at the time of the transactions set forth defendants were commission merchants, and were in.the employ of La Sociedad Anónima de Hilados y Tejides de Caniel, Lda, a corporation (plaintiff’s assignor), as its agents; that plaintiff’s assignor deposited with its said agents certain moneys, to be paid out on its order; that said agents expended a portion of these funds on said assignor’s account; and that the money claimed by plaintiff is a balance remaining in the agents’ hands after such expenditures had been made; which balance plaintiff alleges the defendants…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Upshur v. BriscoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Noble v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Alexander v. Central Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Palmer v. HusseySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bracken v. MilnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Honkanen v. Hopper (In Re Honkanen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- O'BRIEN v. ApplingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Swimmer v. Moeller (In Re Moeller)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.