Legal Opinion
Gudwin v. Gudwin
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 20, 1946No. File 75093PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.
The parties of this case are brothers and both are dentists. The defendant resides in the town of Wethers' field at the comer of Wolcott Hill Road and Wells Road. His house faces Wolcott Hill Road and in it he maintains an office for the practice of his profession. There is a garage, separated from the house and in back of it, which faces Wells Road and is reached by a gravel driveway. Immediately in front of the garage doors is a concrete apron.
The plaintiff had been an officer in the dental corps of the United States Army. He had been discharged and was on terminal leave at the time in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reardon v. ShimelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Comeau v. ComeauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Deacy v. McDonnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Olderman v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Hayes v. New Britain Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Laube v. StevensonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Martin v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Ciaglo v. CiagloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
- Flintrop v. LefcoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Lomberg v. RennerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.