Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. Hanna

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1981No. 11852Published

1Opinion of the Court

635 P.2d 290 (1981)

Ronald J. GOLDSTEIN and Mary E. Goldstein, Appellants,

v.

Fuad HANNA, Respondent.

No. 11852.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

October 29, 1981.

Martin Becker, Patrick R. Doyle, Las Vegas, for appellants.

Leonard A. Wilson, Las Vegas, for respondent.

OPINION

GUNDERSON, Chief Justice:

Appellants, Ronald and Mary Goldstein, sued respondent, Fuad Hanna, to compel specific performance of an option to purchase Hanna's condominium. The district court entered judgment in favor of Hanna. We reverse and remand.

On or about December 10, 1977, the parties entered into a lease relating to Hanna's…

Also in this document: Dissent · Mowbray; Dissent · Manoukian.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Rakestraw v. RodriguesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Summa Corp. v. RichardsonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Ellis v. NelsonNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Edwards v. Carson Water Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API