Friedman v. Urmann
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 5, March T., 1905, by-defendant, from judgment of C. P. Elk Co., April T., 1908, No. 25, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Joseph L. Friedman and John W. Keiler, trading as Friedman, Keiler & Company, v. Alois Urmann. Assumpsit for breach of contract. Before Mayer, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Yerdict and judgment for plaintiff for $311.84. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was in giving binding instructions for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Porter, J.,
The plaintiffs filed a statement averring the right to recover upon the ground that they had in November, 1900, “ verbally agreed with said defendant that he, the said defendant, should handle and sell the goods, wares and merchandise of the plaintiffs at a commission of ten percentum; that said defendant should keep and save harmless the said plaintiffs of and from one-half of any and all losses incurred in selling said goods, wares and merchandise of said plaintiffs; and should bear and pay to plaintiffs one-half of all losses on sales made by or through said defendant;…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilkinson Manufacturing Co. v. WeldeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Hennessy v. AnstockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hale v. HaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Di Cencio v. Di FilippoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923