Legal Opinion

Dick Sears v. Indiana Grain Buyers and Warehouse Licensing Agency

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 2018No. Court of Appeals Case 18A-MI-883Published

1Opinion of the Court

Whether the trial court properly determined that the IGBWLA's interpretation of the term "claimant," defined in I.C. § 26-3-7-2(5), was not arbitrary or capricious.

[3] We affirm.

Facts & Procedural History1

[4] Before we address the facts and history specific to Sears's case, we find that a brief overview of the grain warehousing licensing law is helpful to the analysis.

Grain Warehouse Licensing Law

[5] Many Indiana farmers deliver their harvested grain to a grain warehouse for either storage or sale. The Indiana Grain Buyers and Warehouse Licensing and Bonding Law, Indiana Code Chapter 26-3-7…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huffman v. Indiana Office of Environmental AdjudicationIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. Bartholemew County Beverage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Jay Classroom Teachers Association v. Jay School Corporation and Indiana Education Employment Relations BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Nipsco Indus. Grp. v. N. Ind. Pub. Serv. Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Indiana Department of Environmental Management v. Boone County Resource Recovery Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API