Hill v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Justice.
Appellants Erma Hill and William Hill were found guilty by the trial court of selling fireworks illegally, Ind. Code § 22-11-14-8 and § 22-11-14-6, a Class A misdemeanor, based on a stipulation of facts. They were fined $250 plus court costs.
By a divided vote, the Court of Appeals concluded that Ind. Code § 22-11-14-4 permitted the sale and reversed the convictions. Hill v. State (1985), Ind.App., 482 N.E.2d 492. We grant transfer and affirm the trial court.
The stipulation of facts states that on June 29, 1984, one George Oakley of IIli-nois entered the New-Line Fireworks…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. FullwileyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Spaulding v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by13 opinions
- Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. Windy City Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mechanics Laundry & Supply, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1995
- Dickson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. Windy City Fireworks, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.