Legal Opinion

Tuf-Flex Glass v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 12, 1983No. 82-3024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Tuf-Flex Glass seeks review of the National Labor Relations Board’s finding that Tuf-Flex unlawfully refused to bargain with the intervenor union, following its certification, in violation of Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act; the respondent Board has cross-petitioned for enforcement of its concomitant order directing Tuf-Flex to bargain with the union and to provide certain requested information and to post an appropriate notice. The primary issue raised on appeal is whether there was substantial evidence in the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Overnite Transportation Co. v. Chicago Industrial Tire Co., Appeal of Themis N. Anastos and Paul E. PeldyakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Beatrice McCandless v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Eda Mae Page v. Barko HydraulicsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Bush Hog, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Heath Tec Division/san FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tuf-Flex Glass v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API