Legal Opinion

Cleland v. Applegate

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1894No. 1,034PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

This is an action on a promissory note executed to the appellant by one Nathan Gray, as principal, and by the appellee as surety.

There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the appellee.

*500The overruling of a motion for a new trial is the only error assigned by the appellant.

It is insisted that the evidence does not sustain the verdict. One of the answers was that the note was executed without any consideration. The evidence tends to show that the note was given in partial settlement of a partnership transaction between Gray and the appellant. It also tends to establish the fact…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. HankinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Culver v. MarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. McClain v. JessupIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Pottlitzer v. Citizens Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. State ex rel. Romona Oölitic Stone Co. v. Central States Bridge Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API