Legal Opinion

Stephen Ward v. Harold Copenhaver, et al.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided November 26, 2025No. 3:22-cv-00250Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION STEPHEN WARD PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 3:22-cv-00250-LPR-BBM HAROLD COPENHAVER, et al., DEFENDANTS ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND AMENDED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, CLARIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL In two August 2025 orders, this Court set case-management deadlines under Local Rule 16.1 and denied Plaintiff Stephen Ward’s party-substitution request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. (Docs. 159–160). Unhappy with those orders, Ward seeks reconsideration and other relief in a motion…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API