Legal Opinion

Hruska v. First State Bank of Deanville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1987No. 01-86-0367-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVANS, Chief Justice.

The principal question in this case is whether the trial court properly determined that the appellants were estopped from asserting that a lien on their homestead was invalid. The trial court imposed the lien on the homestead in favor of First State Bank of Deanville to secure repayment of funds advanced for the construction of appellants’ residence. Given the exceptional circumstances of the case, which include the existence of a confidential relationship and conduct giving rise to estoppel, we uphold the trial court’s ruling, concluding that its decision was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Texas Bank and Trust Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. International Security Life Insurance Co. v. FinckTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Bray v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Thomson v. NortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Lincoln v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hruska v. First State Bank of DeanvilleTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gottsch v. Bank of StapletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Trustees of the Northwest Laundry and Dry Cleaners Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Stanislaw R. BurzynskiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Richard Gill Co. v. Jackson's Landing Owners' Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Brazosport Bank of Texas v. Oak Park TownhousesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API