Legal Opinion
In re Protest MacRae
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 22, 1906No. 13,866PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the district court for Douglas county: George A.. Day, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
Charles Metz, the defendant herein, applied to the board of fire and police commissioners of the city of Omaha for a license to sell malt, spirituous and vinous liquors at No. 2705 Leavenworth street, in said city, for the period of one year, commencing bn the first day of January, 1904, under the city ordinances and the provisions of chapter 50, -Compiled Statutes 1903 (Ann. St. 7150-7184). To this application the plaintiff, John D. MacRae, filed a remonstrance, alleging that the applicant’s petition was not signed by 30 freeholders of the ward in which the business was to be conducted; that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- O'Connell v. O'LearyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Commonwealth v. LattinvilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Commonwealth v. WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- State v. McMahonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Monaghan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WhitingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Leathers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
- Shackelford v. ZimmermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1913