Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Brown Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1932No. 21655PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Although an employee may receive an injury while engaged in the performance of the duties of his- employment, the injury, under the expressed terms of section 2 (d) of the workmen’s compensation act as amended (Ga. L. 1920 p. 167 and Ga. L. 1922 p. 185), is not compensable where it was “caused by the wilful act of [a] third person directed against the employee for reasons personal to such employee.”

2. Where an employee whose duty it is to drive a truck has been called aside by his employer, and, while engaged with the latter in conversation, becomes involved in a personal quarrel with a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Duerock v. AcarreguiIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Hughes v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. HANDCRAFTED FURNITURE, INC. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. ZacheryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. State of Georgia v. PurmortCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API