Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Walgreens Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 29, 2014No. 13-1511PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Robert Adamson was terminated from his position as an assistant manager for Defendant-Appellee the Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”) after two instances of failing to provide what Walgreens considered adequate customer service. Adamson appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Walgreens on his state and federal age discrimination claims. We affirm.

I. Facts & Background

Because this appeal is from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Walgreens, we recite the facts in the light most favorable to Adamson and draw all reasonably supported…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  4. McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Chuan Wang v. PalmisanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. Taite v. Bridgewater State UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. Theidon v. Harvard UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. Martinez-Rivera v. Commonwealth of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  5. Pérez v. Oriental Bank & TrustUnited States District Court · 2018

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API